IDR Data
CMS PUF data · 2023 Q1–2025 Q4

Federal IDR outcomes: Intraoperative neuromonitoring in Florida

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the provider or facility offer prevailed in 91.2% of 23,653 determined Federal IDR dispute line items for intraoperative neuromonitoring in Florida. The median prevailing offer was 16.94x the QPA (25th–75th percentile 9.03x–36.15x; n = 20,677). The median time to a decision was 34 business days (n = 23,653).

Determined line items

23,653

2025 Q1–Q4 · 12 split decisions excluded

Provider win rate

91.2%

n = 23,653 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Median payment vs QPA

16.94x

middle half 9.03x–36.15x · n = 20,677 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Median days to decision

34

business days, from dispute initiation · n = 23,653 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Dollar amounts are not shown for specialty groups: the CMS QPA and Offers file, the only source of dollar figures, has no specialty field. See methodology.

By period

PeriodLine itemsWin %Median ×QPA25th–75thRatio nMedian days
2025 Q1–Q423,65391.2%16.94x9.03x–36.15x20,67734
2024 Q1–Q421,91093.0%12.17x7.80x–22.97x20,01273
2023 Q1–Q41,99584.0%4.08x2.52x–14.27x1,84854
2023 Q1–2025 Q447,55891.7%13.76x7.92x–25.51x42,537not pooled

Line items = determined dispute line items (n). Win rate excludes split decisions and includes default decisions. Ratio n = line items reporting a payment-to-QPA ratio. Days are business days as reported by CMS (2023–2024: from IDR entity assignment; 2025: from initiation) and are never pooled.

Most disputed CPT codes

CPT codeLine itemsWin %Median ×QPARatio nMedian days
95938 Placement of skin electrodes and measurement of stimulated sites on arms and leg7,17391.6%27.74x †6,56735
95941 Continuous remote monitoring of nervous system during operation, each hour5,10293.6%9.58x4,60932
95939 Placement of skin electrodes and measurement of central motor stimulation in arm4,69190.8%14.15x4,23330
95870 Needle measurement of electrical activity in arm, leg, trunk or head muscles, li2,11791.8%8.53x1,65251
95937 Testing of nerve-muscle junction94694.2%62.72x †60432
95861 Needle measurement of electrical activity in arm or leg muscles, 2 extremities72291.6%44.93x †58831
95955 Measurement of brain wave activity (EEG) outside the brain during surgery67891.9%89.92x †57532
95868 Needle measurement of electrical activity in muscles on both sides of body21989.0%68.35x †14329
95865 Needle measurement of electrical activity in voice box muscles17584.6%61.73x †12031
95940 Continuous monitoring of nervous system during operation, each 15 minutes12586.4%22.28x †5331
95867 Needle measurement of electrical activity in muscles on side of body5694.6%–1734.5
95886 Needle measurement of electrical activity in arm or leg muscles, complete study5086.0%37.78x †4832

2025 Q1–Q4 · rows with n ≥ 30 determined line items · sorted by n.

Related: all specialties in Florida · Intraoperative neuromonitoring in all states

FAQ

What is the Federal IDR provider win rate for intraoperative neuromonitoring in Florida?

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the provider or facility offer was selected in 91.2% of 23,653 determined dispute line items for intraoperative neuromonitoring in Florida. Split decisions are excluded from the denominator and default decisions are included. Withdrawn, settled and ineligible disputes are not in the CMS data.

How do Federal IDR payments compare with the QPA for intraoperative neuromonitoring in Florida?

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the median prevailing offer was 16.94x the qualifying payment amount (QPA), with a 25th to 75th percentile range of 9.03x to 36.15x (n = 20,677 line items). This uses the CMS field Prevailing Party Offer as % of QPA, where 1.00x equals the QPA.

How long do Federal IDR decisions take for intraoperative neuromonitoring in Florida?

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the median was 34 business days (n = 23,653 line items), using the CMS field Length of Time to Make Determination (from dispute initiation).

How to Utilize IDR