IDR Data
CMS PUF data · 2023 Q1–2025 Q4

CPT 95870: Federal IDR outcomes

Needle measurement of electrical activity in arm, leg, trunk or head muscles, limited study

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the provider or facility offer prevailed in 86.1% of 17,691 determined Federal IDR dispute line items for CPT 95870. The median prevailing offer was 65.93x the QPA (25th–75th percentile 7.76x–150.48x; n = 13,093). The median time to a decision was 34 business days (n = 17,691).

Determined line items

17,691

2025 Q1–Q4 · 23 split decisions excluded

Provider win rate

86.1%

n = 17,691 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Median payment vs QPA

65.93x †

middle half 7.76x–150.48x · n = 13,093 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Median days to decision

34

business days, from dispute initiation · n = 17,691 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Dollar amounts

Total awarded

$148.2M

sum of prevailing offers · n = 12,127 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Total QPA

$1.4M

sum of QPAs, same line items · n = 12,127 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Awarded above QPA

$146.8M

total awarded minus total QPA · n = 12,127 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Median award per line item

$4,561

mean $12,217 · n = 12,127 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Median QPA

$43

per line item · n = 12,127 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Award vs QPA, dollar-weighted

108.66x

total awarded ÷ total QPA · n = 12,127 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Dollar amounts come from the separate CMS “QPA and Offers” file: line items decided for the provider or the plan with a non-suppressed QPA and prevailing offer. That file cannot be joined to the line items above, so its n differs. Awarded = the prevailing (selected) offer; it is not a record of what was paid. State comes from the file’s geographic region; a metro area that spans states counts in each. How the dollar figures work

Dollar amounts by period

PeriodLine items with $Total awardedTotal QPAAbove QPAMedian awardMedian QPAAward ×QPA ($-weighted)
2025 Q1–Q412,127$148.2M$1.4M$146.8M$4,561$43108.66x
2024 Q3–Q45,490$13.7M$1.1M$12.6M$311$4512.90x
2024 Q3–2025 Q417,617$161.8M$2.4M$159.4M$3,040$4466.76x
2023 Q1–2024 Q2Not available (see methodology).

From the CMS QPA and Offers file (see above). Award ×QPA here is total awarded ÷ total QPA, so large claims weigh more than in the per-line median ratio.

By period

PeriodLine itemsWin %Median ×QPA25th–75thRatio nMedian days
2025 Q1–Q417,69186.1%65.93x †7.76x–150.48x13,09334
2024 Q1–Q48,77189.5%7.81x5.68x–52.03x7,35761
2023 Q1–Q451276.2%3.22x1.88x–8.00x38482
2023 Q1–2025 Q426,97487.1%29.98x †6.89x–145.81x20,834not pooled

Line items = determined dispute line items (n). Win rate excludes split decisions and includes default decisions. Ratio n = line items reporting a payment-to-QPA ratio. Days are business days as reported by CMS (2023–2024: from IDR entity assignment; 2025: from initiation) and are never pooled.

By state

State (place of service)Line itemsWin %Median ×QPARatio nMedian days
Texas7,92984.6%138.63x †6,16031
Florida2,14391.8%8.53x1,66951
Georgia1,25088.0%60.72x †65233
New York74085.5%40.61x †52645.5
New Jersey71985.3%30.50x †49635
Arizona57186.0%75.51x †43830
Oklahoma54789.4%149.67x †45432
Missouri48586.4%75.37x †23636
Colorado41386.0%20.30x †32339
Pennsylvania39184.4%7.65x35134
Ohio30182.1%149.54x †28539
Kansas25085.6%82.64x †10537
North Carolina24282.2%41.79x †11140.5
California21086.7%12.27x17236
Virginia16889.3%9.16x11262.5
Kentucky15382.4%133.13x †9636
Tennessee14977.9%9.25x13836
Connecticut13482.8%32.96x †8338
Alabama10088.0%11.27x8531
Illinois9693.8%8.54x8043.5
Wisconsin6978.3%5.25x6438
Maryland6285.5%53.94x †4728
Minnesota5793.0%5.71x3331
Delaware5288.5%7.69x5035.5
Washington4885.4%–2332.5
Nevada4687.0%11.37x4631
South Carolina4684.8%62.14x †3036
Idaho4187.8%22.10x †4026
Oregon4187.8%–2629
Indiana3982.1%7.16x3424
Nebraska3093.3%–1929

2025 Q1–Q4 · rows with n ≥ 30 determined line items · sorted by n.

Dollar amounts by state

State (region)Line items with $Total awardedMedian awardMedian QPAAward ×QPA
Texas5,865$125.4M$4,800$33243.27x
Pennsylvania1,027$3.4M$2,288$6320.78x
New Jersey1,018$3.4M$2,288$6220.44x
New York792$3.1M$2,288$6321.01x
Florida626$1.2M$414$4422.70x
Georgia387$1.2M$3,520$6315.79x
Arizona329$1.5M$4,800$4624.96x
Maryland261$370,515$414$5015.45x
Delaware227$292,860$462$5014.44x
Ohio227$1.3M$4,561$4345.16x
Colorado226$607,373$1,482$6416.54x
Oklahoma176$963,163$4,569$5323.07x
Indiana151$922,762$4,561$3968.12x
Kentucky151$922,762$4,561$3968.12x
Missouri123$380,542$1,850$4536.19x
North Carolina93$253,489$3,520$7235.36x
Tennessee88$89,060$308$5111.42x
California75$170,318$1,839$4916.50x
Illinois60$144,094$650$4827.90x
Virginia52$105,404$414$5021.95x
Kansas43$233,595$5,444$5890.35x
South Carolina43$141,011$3,520$7945.00x
Connecticut42$111,168$2,425$7735.05x
Washington39$41,296$828$7111.29x
Wisconsin35$30,497$414$769.84x
District of Columbia34$77,654$414$5620.97x
West Virginia34$77,654$414$5620.97x

2025 Q1–Q4 · CMS QPA and Offers file · rows with n ≥ 30 line items with dollar amounts · sorted by n · Award ×QPA = total awarded ÷ total QPA.

By specialty

Specialty groupLine itemsWin %Median ×QPARatio nMedian days
Intraoperative neuromonitoring17,15686.5%64.57x †12,66434
Neurology27586.2%117.99x †27138
Not reported / unspecified15952.8%2.17x8651
Orthopedic surgery4195.1%–2134

2025 Q1–Q4 · rows with n ≥ 30 determined line items · sorted by n.

Section: Medicine (90281–99607, excluding E/M)

FAQ

What is the Federal IDR provider win rate for CPT 95870?

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the provider or facility offer was selected in 86.1% of 17,691 determined dispute line items for CPT 95870. Split decisions are excluded from the denominator and default decisions are included. Withdrawn, settled and ineligible disputes are not in the CMS data.

How do Federal IDR payments compare with the QPA for CPT 95870?

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the median prevailing offer was 65.93x the qualifying payment amount (QPA), with a 25th to 75th percentile range of 7.76x to 150.48x (n = 13,093 line items). This uses the CMS field Prevailing Party Offer as % of QPA, where 1.00x equals the QPA.

How long do Federal IDR decisions take for CPT 95870?

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the median was 34 business days (n = 17,691 line items), using the CMS field Length of Time to Make Determination (from dispute initiation).

How to Utilize IDR