IDR Data
CMS PUF data · 2023 Q1–2025 Q4

Federal IDR outcomes: Intraoperative neuromonitoring in South Carolina

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the provider or facility offer prevailed in 86.4% of 2,158 determined Federal IDR dispute line items for intraoperative neuromonitoring in South Carolina. The median prevailing offer was 15.88x the QPA (25th–75th percentile 8.18x–46.66x; n = 1,919). The median time to a decision was 36 business days (n = 2,158).

Determined line items

2,158

2025 Q1–Q4 · 0 split decisions excluded

Provider win rate

86.4%

n = 2,158 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Median payment vs QPA

15.88x

middle half 8.18x–46.66x · n = 1,919 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Median days to decision

36

business days, from dispute initiation · n = 2,158 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Dollar amounts are not shown for specialty groups: the CMS QPA and Offers file, the only source of dollar figures, has no specialty field. See methodology.

By period

PeriodLine itemsWin %Median ×QPA25th–75thRatio nMedian days
2025 Q1–Q42,15886.4%15.88x8.18x–46.66x1,91936
2024 Q1–Q41,39784.5%10.11x5.62x–19.80x1,28644
2023 Q1–Q412882.0%7.47x2.86x–22.84x12348
2023 Q1–2025 Q43,68385.5%12.89x6.41x–33.01x3,328not pooled

Line items = determined dispute line items (n). Win rate excludes split decisions and includes default decisions. Ratio n = line items reporting a payment-to-QPA ratio. Days are business days as reported by CMS (2023–2024: from IDR entity assignment; 2025: from initiation) and are never pooled.

Most disputed CPT codes

CPT codeLine itemsWin %Median ×QPARatio nMedian days
95938 Placement of skin electrodes and measurement of stimulated sites on arms and leg54287.8%23.85x †47936
95941 Continuous remote monitoring of nervous system during operation, each hour37887.3%13.76x33737
95939 Placement of skin electrodes and measurement of central motor stimulation in arm30388.4%15.07x26637
95861 Needle measurement of electrical activity in arm or leg muscles, 2 extremities27086.3%12.18x23335.5
95955 Measurement of brain wave activity (EEG) outside the brain during surgery15383.7%11.31x14952
95937 Testing of nerve-muscle junction10188.1%56.54x †8629
95865 Needle measurement of electrical activity in voice box muscles5587.3%32.97x †5227
95868 Needle measurement of electrical activity in muscles on both sides of body4791.5%54.63x †4327
95870 Needle measurement of electrical activity in arm, leg, trunk or head muscles, li4684.8%62.14x †3036
95886 Needle measurement of electrical activity in arm or leg muscles, complete study3378.8%12.35x33106

2025 Q1–Q4 · rows with n ≥ 30 determined line items · sorted by n.

Related: all specialties in South Carolina · Intraoperative neuromonitoring in all states

FAQ

What is the Federal IDR provider win rate for intraoperative neuromonitoring in South Carolina?

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the provider or facility offer was selected in 86.4% of 2,158 determined dispute line items for intraoperative neuromonitoring in South Carolina. Split decisions are excluded from the denominator and default decisions are included. Withdrawn, settled and ineligible disputes are not in the CMS data.

How do Federal IDR payments compare with the QPA for intraoperative neuromonitoring in South Carolina?

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the median prevailing offer was 15.88x the qualifying payment amount (QPA), with a 25th to 75th percentile range of 8.18x to 46.66x (n = 1,919 line items). This uses the CMS field Prevailing Party Offer as % of QPA, where 1.00x equals the QPA.

How long do Federal IDR decisions take for intraoperative neuromonitoring in South Carolina?

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the median was 36 business days (n = 2,158 line items), using the CMS field Length of Time to Make Determination (from dispute initiation).

How to Utilize IDR