IDR Data
CMS PUF data · 2023 Q1–2025 Q4

Federal IDR outcomes: Intraoperative neuromonitoring in Connecticut

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the provider or facility offer prevailed in 82.8% of 2,805 determined Federal IDR dispute line items for intraoperative neuromonitoring in Connecticut. The median prevailing offer was 18.70x the QPA (25th–75th percentile 4.84x–55.71x; n = 2,128). The median time to a decision was 37 business days (n = 2,805).

Determined line items

2,805

2025 Q1–Q4 · 0 split decisions excluded

Provider win rate

82.8%

n = 2,805 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Median payment vs QPA

18.70x

middle half 4.84x–55.71x · n = 2,128 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Median days to decision

37

business days, from dispute initiation · n = 2,805 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Dollar amounts are not shown for specialty groups: the CMS QPA and Offers file, the only source of dollar figures, has no specialty field. See methodology.

By period

PeriodLine itemsWin %Median ×QPA25th–75thRatio nMedian days
2025 Q1–Q42,80582.8%18.70x4.84x–55.71x2,12837
2024 Q1–Q41,41287.1%18.55x4.30x–39.82x1,14576.5
2023 Q1–Q411070.0%9.78x1.10x–40.66x8686.5
2023 Q1–2025 Q44,32783.9%18.62x4.56x–48.96x3,359not pooled

Line items = determined dispute line items (n). Win rate excludes split decisions and includes default decisions. Ratio n = line items reporting a payment-to-QPA ratio. Days are business days as reported by CMS (2023–2024: from IDR entity assignment; 2025: from initiation) and are never pooled.

Most disputed CPT codes

CPT codeLine itemsWin %Median ×QPARatio nMedian days
95938 Placement of skin electrodes and measurement of stimulated sites on arms and leg73783.6%31.55x †57336
95939 Placement of skin electrodes and measurement of central motor stimulation in arm48282.8%16.43x39535
95861 Needle measurement of electrical activity in arm or leg muscles, 2 extremities36585.8%14.38x25639
95941 Continuous remote monitoring of nervous system during operation, each hour33585.7%10.32x24334
95937 Testing of nerve-muscle junction16782.6%38.54x †10031
95955 Measurement of brain wave activity (EEG) outside the brain during surgery15284.2%38.92x †13539
95870 Needle measurement of electrical activity in arm, leg, trunk or head muscles, li13382.7%32.96x †8338
95868 Needle measurement of electrical activity in muscles on both sides of body3683.3%26.06x †3138
95886 Needle measurement of electrical activity in arm or leg muscles, complete study3479.4%–2767

2025 Q1–Q4 · rows with n ≥ 30 determined line items · sorted by n.

Related: all specialties in Connecticut · Intraoperative neuromonitoring in all states

FAQ

What is the Federal IDR provider win rate for intraoperative neuromonitoring in Connecticut?

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the provider or facility offer was selected in 82.8% of 2,805 determined dispute line items for intraoperative neuromonitoring in Connecticut. Split decisions are excluded from the denominator and default decisions are included. Withdrawn, settled and ineligible disputes are not in the CMS data.

How do Federal IDR payments compare with the QPA for intraoperative neuromonitoring in Connecticut?

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the median prevailing offer was 18.70x the qualifying payment amount (QPA), with a 25th to 75th percentile range of 4.84x to 55.71x (n = 2,128 line items). This uses the CMS field Prevailing Party Offer as % of QPA, where 1.00x equals the QPA.

How long do Federal IDR decisions take for intraoperative neuromonitoring in Connecticut?

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the median was 37 business days (n = 2,805 line items), using the CMS field Length of Time to Make Determination (from dispute initiation).

How to Utilize IDR