IDR Data
CMS PUF data · 2023 Q1–2025 Q4

Federal IDR outcomes: Intraoperative neuromonitoring in Michigan

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the provider or facility offer prevailed in 92.3% of 5,161 determined Federal IDR dispute line items for intraoperative neuromonitoring in Michigan. The median prevailing offer was 29.39x the QPA (25th–75th percentile 11.93x–54.94x; n = 1,840). The median time to a decision was 33 business days (n = 5,161).

Determined line items

5,161

2025 Q1–Q4 · 2 split decisions excluded

Provider win rate

92.3%

n = 5,161 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Median payment vs QPA

29.39x †

middle half 11.93x–54.94x · n = 1,840 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Median days to decision

33

business days, from dispute initiation · n = 5,161 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Dollar amounts are not shown for specialty groups: the CMS QPA and Offers file, the only source of dollar figures, has no specialty field. See methodology.

By period

PeriodLine itemsWin %Median ×QPA25th–75thRatio nMedian days
2025 Q1–Q45,16192.3%29.39x †11.93x–54.94x1,84033
2024 Q1–Q43,10397.8%13.38x7.19x–26.81x39630
2023 Q1–Q44881.2%––2178
2023 Q1–2025 Q48,31294.3%26.11x †9.70x–49.17x2,257not pooled

Line items = determined dispute line items (n). Win rate excludes split decisions and includes default decisions. Ratio n = line items reporting a payment-to-QPA ratio. Days are business days as reported by CMS (2023–2024: from IDR entity assignment; 2025: from initiation) and are never pooled.

Most disputed CPT codes

CPT codeLine itemsWin %Median ×QPARatio nMedian days
95938 Placement of skin electrodes and measurement of stimulated sites on arms and leg82992.2%57.55x †39930
95937 Testing of nerve-muscle junction74992.9%28.08x †13236
95861 Needle measurement of electrical activity in arm or leg muscles, 2 extremities49191.9%15.13x27329
95955 Measurement of brain wave activity (EEG) outside the brain during surgery48893.2%28.13x †18332
95867 Needle measurement of electrical activity in muscles on side of body47893.7%82.05x †7841
95941 Continuous remote monitoring of nervous system during operation, each hour43889.7%13.20x22233
95939 Placement of skin electrodes and measurement of central motor stimulation in arm33893.5%26.71x †17929
95886 Needle measurement of electrical activity in arm or leg muscles, complete study12387.8%–2734
95868 Needle measurement of electrical activity in muscles on both sides of body11688.8%39.64x †4431
95927 Placement of skin electrodes and measurement of stimulated sites in trunk or hea11191.9%81.50x †4831
95865 Needle measurement of electrical activity in voice box muscles5190.2%–2127
95908 Nerve conduction, 3-4 studies4989.8%–1234
95940 Continuous monitoring of nervous system during operation, each 15 minutes3096.7%–544

2025 Q1–Q4 · rows with n ≥ 30 determined line items · sorted by n.

Related: all specialties in Michigan · Intraoperative neuromonitoring in all states

FAQ

What is the Federal IDR provider win rate for intraoperative neuromonitoring in Michigan?

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the provider or facility offer was selected in 92.3% of 5,161 determined dispute line items for intraoperative neuromonitoring in Michigan. Split decisions are excluded from the denominator and default decisions are included. Withdrawn, settled and ineligible disputes are not in the CMS data.

How do Federal IDR payments compare with the QPA for intraoperative neuromonitoring in Michigan?

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the median prevailing offer was 29.39x the qualifying payment amount (QPA), with a 25th to 75th percentile range of 11.93x to 54.94x (n = 1,840 line items). This uses the CMS field Prevailing Party Offer as % of QPA, where 1.00x equals the QPA.

How long do Federal IDR decisions take for intraoperative neuromonitoring in Michigan?

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the median was 33 business days (n = 5,161 line items), using the CMS field Length of Time to Make Determination (from dispute initiation).

How to Utilize IDR