IDR Data
CMS PUF data · 2023 Q1–2025 Q4

Federal IDR outcomes: Urology

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the provider or facility offer prevailed in 89.5% of 1,281 determined Federal IDR dispute line items for urology. The median prevailing offer was 20.83x the QPA (25th–75th percentile 9.24x–50.23x; n = 1,207). The median time to a decision was 29 business days (n = 1,281).

Specialty group built from the CMS free-text specialty field; see the grouping rules.

Determined line items

1,281

2025 Q1–Q4 · 0 split decisions excluded

Provider win rate

89.5%

n = 1,281 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Median payment vs QPA

20.83x †

middle half 9.24x–50.23x · n = 1,207 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Median days to decision

29

business days, from dispute initiation · n = 1,281 · 2025 Q1–Q4

Dollar amounts are not shown for specialty groups: the CMS QPA and Offers file, the only source of dollar figures, has no specialty field. See methodology.

By period

PeriodLine itemsWin %Median ×QPA25th–75thRatio nMedian days
2025 Q1–Q41,28189.5%20.83x †9.24x–50.23x1,20729
2024 Q1–Q446291.8%15.52x7.81x–24.23x40428
2023 Q1–Q4Fewer than 30 determined line items; not shown.
2023 Q1–2025 Q41,75990.1%19.15x8.75x–42.82x1,627not pooled

Line items = determined dispute line items (n). Win rate excludes split decisions and includes default decisions. Ratio n = line items reporting a payment-to-QPA ratio. Days are business days as reported by CMS (2023–2024: from IDR entity assignment; 2025: from initiation) and are never pooled.

By state

State (place of service)Line itemsWin %Median ×QPARatio nMedian days
New Jersey78690.2%16.09x73332
California45788.2%51.70x †45126

2025 Q1–Q4 · rows with n ≥ 30 determined line items · sorted by n.

Most disputed CPT codes

CPT codeLine itemsWin %Median ×QPARatio nMedian days
52344 Repair of stricture of ureter using an endoscope17889.9%14.49x16133
52356 Crushing of stone of ureter with insertion of stent using an endoscope15692.9%22.44x †15429
52330 Manipulation of stone in ureter using an endoscope11890.7%11.87x10430.5
52352 Removal or manipulation of stone in ureter or kidney using an endoscope11588.7%29.66x †9937
50590 Shock wave crushing of kidney stones6190.2%8.84x6134
52332 Insertion of stent in ureter using an endoscope6191.8%50.40x †5936
55866 Surgical removal of prostate and surrounding lymph nodes using an endoscope4285.7%24.23x †4224.5
74420 Imaging of urinary tract following injection of a contrast agent4087.5%177.12x †4028
38571 Removal of lymph nodes of both sides of pelvis using an endoscope3582.9%50.23x †3525
99231 Subsequent hospital care with straightforward or low level of medical decision m3582.9%99.05x †3529
52005 Insertion of tube into ureter using an endoscope through bladder area3482.4%127.24x †3236

2025 Q1–Q4 · rows with n ≥ 30 determined line items · sorted by n.

FAQ

What is the Federal IDR provider win rate for urology?

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the provider or facility offer was selected in 89.5% of 1,281 determined dispute line items for urology. Split decisions are excluded from the denominator and default decisions are included. Withdrawn, settled and ineligible disputes are not in the CMS data.

How do Federal IDR payments compare with the QPA for urology?

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the median prevailing offer was 20.83x the qualifying payment amount (QPA), with a 25th to 75th percentile range of 9.24x to 50.23x (n = 1,207 line items). This uses the CMS field Prevailing Party Offer as % of QPA, where 1.00x equals the QPA.

How long do Federal IDR decisions take for urology?

In 2025 Q1–Q4, the median was 29 business days (n = 1,281 line items), using the CMS field Length of Time to Make Determination (from dispute initiation).

How to Utilize IDR